Perbandingan kurikulum pendidikan bidan di Indonesia, New Zealand, dan Australia

Ari Indra Susanti

doi:10.17509/jik.v18i2.36410

Abstract

Midwives are one of the health workers as a profession that continues to develop so that they must follow the developments and changes of globalization. The era of globalization demands the availability of professional human resources in providing services to the community. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a midwife education curriculum based on the needs of the times by comparing the midwife education curriculum in Indonesia, New Zealand, and Australia. The method used in writing this article uses a literature review in the form of a library synthesis compilation process. The stage was carried out by browsing the literature, finding the main idea of each article, and writing in a paraphrase style. This has done by collecting various references in the form of scientific articles and text books based on studies on the midwifery education curriculum in Indonesia, New Zealand, and Australia. Thus, the results of the comparative study of midwifery education curriculum aim to develop a midwife education curriculum that can produce professional midwife graduates in providing women-centred care.

Abstrak

Bidan adalah salah satu tenaga kesehatan sebagai profesi yang terus berkembang sehingga harus mengikuti perkembangan dan perubahan globalisasi. Era globalisasi menuntut tersedianya sumber daya manusia profesional dalam memberikan pelayanan kepada masyarakat. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pengembangan kurikulum pendidikan bidan berdasarkan kebutuhan perkembangan zaman dengan membandingkan kurikulum pendidikan bidan di Indonesia, New Zaeland, dan Australia. Metode yang digunakan pada penulisan artikel ini dengan menggunakan penelaahan literatue (literature riview) berupa proses penyusunana sintesis kepustakaan. Tahap yang dilakukan dengan menelusuri kepustakaan, menemukan ide utama setiap artikel, dan menuliskan dengan gaya paraphrase. Hal tersebut, dilakukan dengan mengumpulkan berbagai referensi berupa artikel-artikel ilmiah dan text book berdasarkan kajian tentang kurikulum pendidikan bidan di Negara Indonesia, New Zaeland, dan Australia. Dengan demikan, hasil kajian perbandingan kurikulum pendidikan bidan bertujuan untuk mengembangkan kurikulum pendidikan bidan yang dapat menghasilkan lulusan bidan profesional dalam memberikan asuhan yang berpusat pada wanita.

Kata Kunci: Bidan, Kurikulum, Pendidikan

Keywords:

Midwife Curriculum Education

References

Achampong, E. K. (2017). Assessing the current curriculum of the nursing and midwifery informatics course at all nursing and midwifery institutions in Ghana. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 4, 2382120517706890. https://doi.org/10.1177/2382120517706890

Asosiasi Pendidikan Kebidanan Indonesia. (2018). Buku panduan kurikulum pendidikan profesi bidan.

Azadi, Z., Ravanipour, M., Yazdankhahfard, M., Motamed, N., & Pouladi, S. (2017). Perspectives of nursing and midwifery students regarding the role of the hidden curriculum in patient education: A qualitative study. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 6, 98. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_120_16

Benoit, C., Davis-Floyd, R., Van Teijlingen, E., Sandall, J., & Miller, J. (2001). Designing midwives: A comparison of educational models. Dalam R. De Vries, C. Benoit, E. Van Teijlingen, & S. Wrede (Ed.), Birth by design: Pregnancy, maternity care and midwifery in North America & Europe (hlm. 139–165). Routledge.

Bharj, K. K., Luyben, A., Avery, M. D., Johnson, P. G., Barger, M. K., & Bick, D. (2016). An agenda for midwifery education: Advancing the state of the world’s midwifery. Midwifery, 33, 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.01.004

Bogren, M., Begum, F., & Erlandsson, K. (2017). The historical development of the midwifery profession in Bangladesh. Journal of Asian Midwives, 4(1), 65–74.

Bogren, M., Rosengren, J., Erlandsson, K., & Berg, M. (2019). Build professional competence and equip with strategies to empower midwifery students – An interview study evaluating a simulation-based learning course for midwifery educators in Bangladesh. Nurse Education in Practice, 35, 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.12.008

Bradley, S., McCourt, C., Rayment, J., & Parmar, D. (2019). Midwives’ perspectives on (dis)respectful intrapartum care during facility-based delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis. Reproductive Health, 16(1), Artikel 116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0782-0

Cummins, A. M., Catling, C., & Homer, C. S. (2018). Enabling new graduate midwives to work in midwifery continuity of care models: A conceptual model for implementation. Women and Birth, 31(5), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2017.12.008

Cummins, A. M., Smith, R., Catling, C., Watts, N., Scarf, V., Fox, D., & Gray, J. (2018). Midwifery graduate attributes: A model for curriculum development and education. Midwifery, 65, 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.07.001

De Vries, R., Benoit, C., Van Teijlingen, E., & Wrede, S. (Ed.). (2001). Birth by design: Pregnancy, maternity care and midwifery in North America & Europe. Routledge.

Edwards, G., Hellen, K., & Brownie, S. (2018). Developing a work/study programme for midwifery education in East Africa. Midwifery, 59, 74–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.01.009

Erlandsson, K., Doraiswamy, S., Wallin, L., & Bogren, M. (2018). Capacity building of midwifery faculty to implement a 3-years midwifery diploma curriculum in Bangladesh: A process evaluation of a mentorship programme. Nurse Education in Practice, 29, 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.12.012

Gardner, G. E., Carryer, J., Dunn, S., & Gardner, A. (2004). Nurse practitioner standards project: Report to Australian Nursing and Midwifery Council. Australian Nursing & Midwifery Council.

Ghazanfarpour, M., Khadivzadeh, T., Tamimi, S., Rajab Dizavandi, F., Kargarfard, L., Shariati, K., & Saeidi, M. (2018). Curriculum development in midwife education: A systematic review. International Journal of Pediatrics, 6(7), 7973–7981. https://doi.org/10.22038/ijp.2018.30907.2728

Hanekom, S. D., Unger, M., & Cilliers, F. (2014). Deriving criteria by which to determine core curriculum content: A high engagement process. African Journal of Health Professions Education, 6(2), 180–184. https://doi.org/10.7196/AJHPE.358

Hasne Ara Akther, R., & Zohra Khatoon, R. (2019). Social, economic and professional barriers influencing midwives' realities in Bangladesh: A qualitative study of midwifery educators preparing midwifery students for clinical reality. Evidence Based Midwifery, 17(1), 19–26.

Keogh, J. J., Fourie, W. J., Watson, S., & Gay, H. (2010). Involving the stakeholders in the curriculum process: A recipe for success? Nurse Education Today, 30(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.05.019

Lopes, S. C., Nove, A., ten Hoope-Bender, P., de Bernis, L., Bokosi, M., Moyo, N. T., & Homer, C. S. (2016). A descriptive analysis of midwifery education, regulation and association in 73 countries: The baseline for a post-2015 pathway. Human Resources for Health, 14(1), Artikel 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-016-0134-7

Luyben, A., Barger, M. K., Avery, M. D., & Bick, D. (2018). What is next? Midwifery education building partnerships for tomorrow’s maternal and neonatal health care. Midwifery, 58, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.01.002

Maree, C., Yazbek, M., & Leech, R. (2018). Process of development of a contemporary curriculum in advanced midwifery. Health SA Gesondheid, 23(1), Artikel 1040. https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v23i0.1040

Midwifery Council. (2019). Standards for approval of pre-registration midwifery education programmes and accreditation of tertiary education organisations (Edisi ke-3).

Milne, T., Skinner, J., & Baird, K. (2014). Survey results of first and second year New Zealand midwifery students’ level of engagement in a flexible delivery programme. New Zealand College of Midwives Journal, (50), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.12784/nzcomjnl50.2014.3.18-24

Nove, A., Moyo, N. T., Bokosi, M., & Garg, S. (2018). The Midwifery Services Framework: The process of implementation. Midwifery, 58, 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.12.016

Nyoni, C., & Botma, Y. (2019). A framework for implementing and sustaining a curricular innovation in a higher education midwifery programme. African Journal of Health Professions Education, 11(3), 96–100. https://doi.org/10.7196/AJHPE.2019.v11i3.1118

O'Rourke, J. A., Relf, B., Crawford, N., & Sharp, S. (2019). Are we all on course? A curriculum mapping comparison of three Australian university open-access enabling programs. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 59(1), 7–26.

Ornstein, A. C., Levine, D. U., Gutek, G., & Vocke, D. E. (2016). Foundations of education. Nelson Education.

Rahayu, T., Syafril, S., Wekke, I. S., & Erlinda, R. (2019). Teknik menulis review literatur dalam sebuah artikel ilmiah. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 7(1), 22–30.

Ramasubramaniam, S., & Grace, A. (2015). Curriculum development in nursing education: Where is the pathway? IOSR Journal of Nursing and Health Science, 4(5), 76–81.

Taghizadeh, Z., Montazeri, A., & Khoshnamrad, M. (2015). Educational needs of midwifery students regarding mother and infant mortality prevention services in critical situations. Journal of Hayat, 21(2), 54–66.

Uwizeye, G., Mukamana, D., Relf, M., Rosa, W., Kim, M. J., Uwimana, P., ... & Lubimbi, N. (2018). Building nursing and midwifery capacity through Rwanda’s Human Resources for Health Program. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 29(2), 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659617705138

Vermeulen, J., Luyben, A., O'Connell, R., Gillen, P., Escuriet, R., & Fleming, V. (2019). Failure or progress?: The current state of the professionalisation of midwifery in Europe. European Journal of Midwifery, 3(22), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/115038

Zhou, N., & Lu, H. (2018). A review and comparison of midwifery management and education in five representative countries. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 5(1), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2017.12.008