Good citizenship and educated citizens: Social studies curricula comparison in Indonesia-England

Ines Alifah Wachidatun Chasanah; Anik  Widiastuti

doi:10.64014/jik.v22i4.192

Authors

Ines Alifah Wachidatun Chasanah Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4681-3275
Anik Widiastuti Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64014/jik.v22i4.192

Keywords:

comparative study, educated citizens, good citizenship, social studies curriculum

Abstract

The primary objective of social studies education is to develop citizens with civic skills and the ability to analyze social issues critically. This study aims to examine the comparative orientation of the objectives of the social studies curriculum in Indonesia, which emphasizes the formation of good citizenship character, and the orientation of the curriculum in England, which emphasizes the profile of educated citizens. This study is important to understand the philosophical differences underlying how each country conceptualizes social studies education. This study employs a content analysis method to objectively, systematically, and comprehensively analyze the contents of texts and curriculum documents in both countries. This study analyzed 11 curriculum documents from both countries, comprising five from Indonesia and six from England, using the Atlas.In their application, researchers analyzed the learning objectives, social studies content, and learning approaches using search keywords. The results of the content analysis of the curriculum documents indicate that the objectives of the social studies curriculum in Indonesia are oriented towards strengthening national identity through values, character, and morals (good citizenship), while in England, they are oriented towards developing students' capacity to play an active role in a democratic and global society (educated citizens). This suggests that the development of social studies in both countries aligns with the curriculum's needs and objectives.

Abstrak

Tujuan utama dari pendidikan IPS adalah untuk membentuk warga negara yang memiliki keterampilan kewargaan dengan analisis kritis tehadap isu-isu sosial. Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji perbandingan orientasi tujuan kurikulum IPS di Indonesia yang menekankan pada pembentukan karakter good citizenship dan orientasi tujuan kurikulum di Inggris yang menekankan pada profil educated citizens. Studi ini penting untuk memahami perbedaan filosofis yang mendasari bagaimana setiap negara mengkonseptualisasikan pendidikan IPS. Studi ini menggunakan metode analisis konten untuk menganalisis isi teks dan dokumen kurikulum di kedua negara secara objektif, sistematis, dan generalisis. Studi ini menganalisis 11 dokumen kurikulum dari kedua negara, yang meliputi 5 dokumen kurikulum di Indonesia dan 6 dokumen kurikulum di Inggris. Dengan menggunakan aplikasi atlas.ti, peneliti melakukan analisis terhadap tujuan pembelajaran, konten materi social studies, dan pendekatan pembelajaran dengan menggunakan kata kunci pencarian. Hasil analisis konten terhadap dokumen-dokumen kurikulum menunjukan bahwa tujuan kurikulum IPS di Indonesia berorientasi pada penguatan identitas bangsa melalui nilai, karakter, dan moral (good citizenship), sementara di Inggris berorientasi pada pengembangan kapasitas siswa dalam berperan aktif pada masyakarat demokratis dan global (educated citizens). Hal ini menunjukan bahwa pengembangan social studies di kedua negara bersifat kontekstual, sesuai dengan kebutuhan dan orientasi tujuan kurikulum yang ingin dicapai.

Kata Kunci: kewarganegaraan yang baik; kurikulum IPS; studi perbandingan; warga negara yang terdidik

Author Biography

Anik Widiastuti, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Departement Social Studies Education

References

Abdulahi, A., Andishmand, V., Bahreinizadeh, A., & Zeinaddiny Meymand, Z. (2024). Examining the components of a curriculum based on cultural literacy in education. ‪Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology, 7(4), 21-30. ‬‬‬‬‬‬

Adiwardana, M. R., Herwin, & Indah, F. (2025). Pancasila student profile strengthening project: Self-efficacy and its influence on primary school students’ motivation to engage in citizenship issues. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 8(3), 424-433.

Asrulla, A., Rosadi, K. I., Jeka, F., Saksitha, D. A., & Wahyuni, D. (2025). Kontribusi aspek sosial dan budaya dalam aplikasi kebijakan pendidikan nasional Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar (JIPDAS), 5(1), 404-423.

Azzahra, A. H., Nawry, N., & Nelwati, S. (2024). Peran pendidikan kewarganegaraan dalam membangun identitas nasional. Sinar Dunia: Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(2), 23-31.

Balqis, A. R., Susanti, E., Ramayeni, E., Putri, M., Bahria, B., Andini, T., & Harahap, Z. S. (2024). Ilmu pengetahuan sosial sebagai transmisi kewarganegaraan. Sosial: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan IPS, 2(2), 266-272.

Bombaerts, G., Doulougeri, K., Tsui, S., Laes, E., Spahn, A., & Martin, D. A. (2021). Engineering students as co-creators in an ethics of technology course. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(4), 1-26.

Busey, C. L., Duncan, K. E., & Dowie-Chin, T. (2023). Critical what what? A theoretical systematic review of 15 years of critical race theory research in social studies education, 2004-2019. Review of Educational Research, 93(3), 412-453.

Camposano, S., Rogayan, D. V., & Crisolo, O. R. (2021). Relevance of social studies in the 21st century society: Students perspectives. International Journal of Didactical Studies, 2(1), 101457-101457.

Coşkun-Yaşar, G., & Aslan, B. (2021). Curriculum theory: A review study. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 11(2), 237-260.

Erol, H. (2021). Reflections on the 21st century skills into the curriculum of social studies course. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 9(2), 90-102.

Fahira, W. R., Rahmadhani, P., Satria, N., Melisa, F., & Setiawati, M. (2022). Persepsi siswa kelas X terhadap penerapan kurikulum merdeka belajar pada pembelajaran IPS di SMA 1 Bukit Sundi. Jurnal Eduscience (JES), 9(3), 902-909.

Folorunso, C. O., & Adegboye, A. A. (2024). The role of social studies education in achieving a global peace. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 11(7), 602-610.

Harrison, N. (2022). Curriculum and the rise of theory: Learning to be a stranger in the world. Curriculum Perspectives, 42(1), 91-96.

Hartshorne, R., Waring, S. M., & Okraski, H. (2019). Developing well-informed, critically thinking, and active citizens through the connection of modeling and simulation and social studies education. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 92(1), 48-52.

Hecht, A., Obradović, S., & Andreouli, E. (2025). Supportive but suspicious: Ideology, institutional trust, electoral participation and gender shape public opinion on citizenship education in the UK. British Educational Research Journal, 51(2), 848-868.

Hidayat, R. (2022). Curriculum development and the concept of social science education in Indonesia. Social Studies Conference Proceedings, 1(1), 318-326.

Husnah, A., Fitriani, A., Patricya, F., Modesta, & Handayani, T. P. (2023). Analisis materi IPS dalam pembelajaran IPAS kurikulum merdeka di sekolah dasar. JPDSH: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Sosial Humaniora, 3(1), 1-8.

Jerome, L., Sant, E., Britton, A., Emerson, L., James, S., & Milliken, M. (2022). Citizenship education in the United Kingdom: Comparing England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. Journal of Social Science Education, 21(4), 1-23.

Kong, Y. (2021). The role of experiential learning on students’ motivation and classroom engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(10), 10-13.

Kusumaningsih, N., Mahrany, Y., & Bahri. (2024). Telaah pengembangan kurikulum IPS di era merdeka belajar. Dinamika Pembelajaran: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Bahasa, 1(4), 414-428.

Lathifah, I., Fungkiuudin, H., Trisnaningtyas, R., Setiawan, R. Y., Alfiyah, N. A., Muthoharoh, L., & Rohman, N. (2023). Tantangan implementasi kurikulum pendidikan IPS di era globalisasi. Concept: Journal of Social Humanities and Education, 2(4), 213-223.

Marsiana, E. (2021). The historical dimensions of the social studies education curriculum in Indonesia. Social Studies Conference Proceedings, 1(1), 16-24.

Nursa’ban, E., Ewisahrani, E., & Fathurrahmaniah, F. (2021). Penggunaan modul kimia berbasis Problem Based Learning (PBL) untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan), 5(2).

Offorma, G. C. (2016). Integrating components of culture in curriculum planning. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 8(1), 1-8.

Okojie, M. U., Bastas, M., & Miralay, F. (2022). Using curriculum mapping as a tool to match student learning outcomes and social studies curricula. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(1), 1-17.

Safitri, D., Antania S., D., Oktovia, D., Sari, P. A., Amalia, R., & Salsabila, S. (2024). Prinsip dan tujuan pembelajaran IPS membangun warga negara berpengetahuan luas dan berpikir kritis. Jurnal Komunikasi dan Media Pendidikan, 2(1), 53-59.

Syamsiar, H., Lasmawan, I. W., & Sudiarta, I. G. P. (2023). Implementation of independent learning curriculum in social studies learning: Literature review. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 8(3), 1789-1796.

Tauginienė, L., Butkevičienė, E., Vohland, K., Heinisch, B., Daskolia, M., Suškevičs, M., Portela, M., Balázs, B., & Prūse, B. (2020). Citizen science in the social sciences and humanities: The power of interdisciplinarity. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), 1-11.

Wali-Essien, R. C., Chukwuemeka, E. J., & Edinoh, K. (2025). Social studies as a tool for peace education and navigating current realities in Nigeria. Global Scientific and Academic Research Journal of Education and Literature, 3(1), 1-10.

Wang, T. (2025). Toward glocal citizenship: Rethinking the traditions, goals, and curricular themes of international education. Intercultural Education, 37(1), 1-20.